FF6 Hacking
Genji Glove glitch - Printable Version

+- FF6 Hacking (https://www.ff6hacking.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discussion Forums (https://www.ff6hacking.com/forums/forum-5.html)
+--- Forum: Magitek Research Facility (https://www.ff6hacking.com/forums/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: Genji Glove glitch (/thread-4209.html)



Genji Glove glitch - doofenH - 05-10-2022

If wielding weapons with Genji Glove like 2 Ragnarök which consume MP for critical damage, if the 1st attack successfully hit the enemy & cast Flare, the 2nd attack will oddly not consume MP for critical hit, but still allow another 25% Flare chance. Anyone can previously solve this glitch before?


RE: Genji Glove glitch - assassin - 05-11-2022

yo:
https://www.ff6hacking.com/forums/thread-3722-post-36780.html?highlight=multi+strike#pid36780

also, regarding:
Quote:if the 1st attack successfully hit the enemy & cast Flare,

this is a bug:
Quote:the 2nd attack will oddly not consume MP for critical hit,

because one strike is corrupting later strikes due to property toggles lingering within a turn.

however, i see no problem with this:
Quote:but still allow another 25% Flare chance

the weapon spell casting does not use MP in the first place, so there's no reason that disabling the auto-criticals should disable spells.


RE: Genji Glove glitch - doofenH - 05-11-2022

(05-11-2022, 05:30 AM)assassin Wrote: yo:
https://www.ff6hacking.com/forums/thread-3722-post-36780.html?highlight=multi+strike#pid36780

also, regarding:
Quote:if the 1st attack successfully hit the enemy & cast Flare,

this is a bug:
Quote:the 2nd attack will oddly not consume MP for critical hit,

because one strike is corrupting later strikes due to property toggles lingering within a turn.

however, i see no problem with this:
Quote:but still allow another 25% Flare chance

the weapon spell casting does not use MP in the first place, so there's no reason that disabling the auto-criticals should disable spells.

It work. Thk. Btw, I wasn't saying the 25% Flare chance had issue. I was just pointing it out that it work just fine. Only the critical had issue, that's all. 

I used the free space starting $C26469. Hopefully there is no critical fix patch use this part.